An Evolving Natural Approach: Improving and Optimizing Function in a Chronic Disease World
Over the weekend I found myself contemplating a lot on the subject of function and chronic disease. The wave of the future in healthcare is improving and optimizing function. Of course this raises a few of questions. What do I mean by function? How do we improve and optimize it? And how do we address chronic disease? The definition of function is instructive. It is “an activity or purpose natural to or intended fo a person or thing.” (1) Function has to do with what our body naturally does. We move, we eat, we live, and we are intended to enjoy this life. By improving function we improve the way nature has intended for us to live. But how do we improve it? I am going to address this in regards to chronic disease.
The CDC’s Chronic Disease Overview illustrates a striking picture. Consider the following:
- One in two Americans have one or more chronic diseases.
- One in four have two or more.
- Seven of the top 10 causes of death are from chronic disease.
- Almost 50% of those deaths resulting from heart disease and cancer. Obesity is at all time high.
- Arthritis has become the most common cause of disability. Diabetes is rampant and is the leading cause of kidney failure. Our risks for chronic diseases keeps growing.
- Almost 80% of people do not meet the recommendations for aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activity.
- A study done in 2015 shows that 40% adults eat fruit less than once a day and 22% of adults eat vegetables less than once a day. Showing most people do not eat fruits and vegetables on a regular basis.
- 480,000 people die from cigarette smoking each year. Alcohol accounts for 88,000 deaths per year. And these statistics are for the US. (2)
Reductionism
Typically, conventional medicine looks at an issue reductionistically. That is, they try to divide complex problems into its individual components. However, there are limitations to this approach. “When the human body is viewed as a collection of components, the natural inclination of medicine is to isolate the single factor that is most responsible for the observed behavior. Much like a mechanic who repairs a broken car by identifying that isolatable abnormality. Implicit within this practice is the deeply rooted belief that each disease has a potential singular target for medical treatment. For infection, the target is the pathogen; for cancer, it is the tumor; and for gastrointestinal bleeding, it is the bleeding vessel or ulcer.” (4) This approach has been successful, don’t get me wrong. If someone has a serious infection such as pneumonia, they receive antibiotic treatment that is life-saving. Acute cases are dealt with tremendous success. But with the chronically ill we hit the limitations. Especially when we consider that 85% of chronic disease is due to environmental factors like diet, toxin exposure, and lifestyle. (5) Conventional medicine often relies on bringing the body to a balance. This is called homeostasis. If someone has high blood pressure they are given a blood pressure medication to reduce it. Often the underlying causative factor is ignored. Also being ignored is the effect the medication has on other systems of the body until a symptom presents itself. Maybe a different medication will be given or dosage may be modified. In addition to this a new medication may be given to counteract the effects of the blood pressure medication. This is done to help our body keep within what we consider normal ranges. Blood pressure for instance should be around 120/80. So the primary goal is to balance each component part but their relation to each other and their relation to each body system is often ignored. “The exclusive focus on normal ranges belies the importance of dynamic stability. Because reductionism often disregards the dynamic interactions between parts, the system is often depicted as a collection of static components.” (4) So each part is tackled one at a time individually. For example, hyperlipidemia and hypertension will be addressed separate from each other. Diseases are also treated in this fashion. Therefore, if you have diabetes and Hashimoto’s they will be addressed separately as two individual parts. This does make it easier to treat in an organized fashion however, the interplay between the two diseases is neglected. (4) Reductionism is also used in our research. “The science underlying our medical practices, from diagnosis to treatment to prevention, is based on the assumption that information about individual parts is sufficient to explain the whole.” (4) This can be seen in studies that have shown a relationship between cholesterol and heart disease or saturated fats and cholesterol. You can read all about that in my cholesterol article. Suffice it say that addressing LDL cholesterol by lowering it with a medication neglects to answer many questions as well as the effect it has on the overall systems of the body. There are some definite negative effects but also like using a band aid it simply removes a symptom without addressing the causative factor. Reductionism has a hard time answering the questions of how diet and lifestyle contribute to a given disease. Therefore, a different approach is needed.A Systems Approach
A systems approach views the body holistically rather than in it is individual component parts. The systems of the body are addressed with the understanding that they are interdependent to each other. “The intention of applying these theories to biological systems (termed “systems biology”) is to understand how properties emerge from the nonlinear interaction of multiple components. How does consciousness arise from the interactions between neurons? How do normal cellular functions such as cellular division, cell activation, differentiation, and apoptosis emerge from the interaction of genes? These questions highlight the difficulty of understanding complex biological systems—the moment the lens is directed toward the components of a biological system, the behaviors and properties of the whole system become obscure. Plainly said, one loses sight of the forest for the trees.” (4) We are in the business of looking at the forest as a whole while understanding how each tree works in regards to the forest. There are several principles that guide this holistic approach.- We believe that the body has the ability to heal and prevent most diseases. Hence we rely on supporting the body’s healing process via natural methods.
- Each person is biochemically unique and must be treated that way. This is called biochemical individuality. Therefore, the individual is treated not just the disease. Of course, this requires the practitioners to have in depth understanding of each of the body’s systems as well as biochemistry. We have to keep up to date and constantly evolving our approach as a deeper understanding develops. Hence, a evolving natural approach.
- Time. The average doctor’s visit is 10-12 minutes. It is very difficult to get to the underlying cause in that short period of time. We typically spend 30 to 60 minutes per patient.
- We improve and optimize function through diet, lifestyle, and behavior change.